JLo Tweets And Deletes #AllLivesMatter

Started by Freemala Harris, July 12, 2016, 01:47:46 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Kurama

Quote from: Genesis on July 12, 2016, 05:32:42 PM
Quote from: Kurama on July 12, 2016, 05:26:33 PM
Quote from: Genesis on July 12, 2016, 05:22:35 PM
Quote from: Kurama on July 12, 2016, 05:18:44 PM
Quote from: Genesis on July 12, 2016, 05:15:58 PM
two girls under the age of 10 were murdered in chicago by gang members not to long ago and not a damn peep from nobody. And guess what? The killer's still free despite the community knowing who did it.


A cop kills someone and everyone wants to protest march and be a patriot.


Are you white?

Why do you keep spouting this nonsense.

People in CHICAGO do advocate & protest and speak out against gang/gun violence.

Just because the shit isn't televised doesn't mean the work isn't being done. Turn off the damn tv and immerse yourself into these communities you speak so much of, but know little about. You folks annoying af.

I am Black.

And if they protest, how come its not on the same scale and magnitude of the blm protests? It's alot more money  and effort invested in that.


You're crazy if you  actually think the interests of black on black murder is the same as white on black murder.

Idk Chicago is 1 city and the police are killing people all over the nation? Maybe....

Idk what the last sentence means but mkay
Black people are killing black people more than police are :dead:

It's just easier to blame the white man (as we should) instead of taking responsibility for our own issues as well.

That last sentence means 100 people go to black violence protests and 50,000 attend a blm protest.

White people are killing white people more than police are :dead:

Its easy to look at a effects of something rather than the precipitating factors that caused them.

I explained that last post but again mkay lolz

Genesis

Quote from: Kurama on July 12, 2016, 05:38:20 PM
Quote from: Genesis on July 12, 2016, 05:32:42 PM
Quote from: Kurama on July 12, 2016, 05:26:33 PM
Quote from: Genesis on July 12, 2016, 05:22:35 PM
Quote from: Kurama on July 12, 2016, 05:18:44 PM
Quote from: Genesis on July 12, 2016, 05:15:58 PM
two girls under the age of 10 were murdered in chicago by gang members not to long ago and not a damn peep from nobody. And guess what? The killer's still free despite the community knowing who did it.


A cop kills someone and everyone wants to protest march and be a patriot.


Are you white?

Why do you keep spouting this nonsense.

People in CHICAGO do advocate & protest and speak out against gang/gun violence.

Just because the shit isn't televised doesn't mean the work isn't being done. Turn off the damn tv and immerse yourself into these communities you speak so much of, but know little about. You folks annoying af.

I am Black.

And if they protest, how come its not on the same scale and magnitude of the blm protests? It's alot more money  and effort invested in that.


You're crazy if you  actually think the interests of black on black murder is the same as white on black murder.

Idk Chicago is 1 city and the police are killing people all over the nation? Maybe....

Idk what the last sentence means but mkay
Black people are killing black people more than police are :dead:

It's just easier to blame the white man (as we should) instead of taking responsibility for our own issues as well.

That last sentence means 100 people go to black violence protests and 50,000 attend a blm protest.

White people are killing white people more than police are :dead:

Its easy to look at a effects of something rather than the precipitating factors that caused them.

I explained that last post but again mkay lolz
White people also make up almost 80% of the country. We only make up 14% and have violent crimes just as high.


Yes, its a known fact black violence is a product of poverty that was created by the  white government on purpose. We can keep the same cycle of ignorance or unify( like we do for blm) and change the real problems at hand.


Eliminating police brutality will not improve the problems in the black community.

mauza

 

"جاني الاسمر"

mauza

 

"جاني الاسمر"

D.I.E.G.O.

Genesis...stfu baby. There have been large scale protests in Chicago. They are not getting the same attention/coverage other cities are getting, but that doesn't mean they are not happening. Damn dummy.

b7

Quote from: Vonc2002 on July 12, 2016, 02:16:24 PM
Saying ALM wouldn't matter......AT ANY OTHER TIME!  BLM was implemented for a reason and screaming ALM at this time  is an attempt to change the narrative imo. U werent preaching all lives matter before we started raising awareness to the crimes targeting AA so don't yell it now.  Its definitely a tactic to deviate from the issue at hand and its complete bullshit TBRFHWY
!!

not sure why this thread went much further than this post lol this can't be argued

Genesis

Quote from: GoDiegoGo on July 12, 2016, 05:49:11 PM
Genesis...stfu baby. There have been large scale protests in Chicago. They are not getting the same attention/coverage other cities are getting, but that doesn't mean they are not happening. Damn dummy.
What chicago protest was as big as the blm protest in chicago?

Alot black murders go unsolved because of the silence from the neighborhoods

You're a fucking dummy for being in denial. Black murder is glorified from our music to everyday life.

b7

Quote from: GRAND on July 12, 2016, 02:26:23 PM
Quote from: Vonc2002 on July 12, 2016, 02:16:24 PM
Saying ALM wouldn't matter......AT ANY OTHER TIME!  BLM was implemented for a reason and screaming ALM at this time  is an attempt to change the narrative imo. U werent preaching all lives matter before we started raising awareness to the crimes targeting AA so don't yell it now.  Its definitely a tactic to deviate from the issue at hand and its complete bullshit TBRFHWY
I agree

I just feel bad for the people that are uninformed idiots, that mean well  :dead:
id be easier on her if she were sheltered her entire life and grew up in Hollywood. That's not the case for her

I'm shocked she'd wanna pander to these folks like that smh

Genesis

July 12, 2016, 05:55:04 PM #128 Last Edit: July 12, 2016, 05:55:33 PM by Genesis
Never seen a freeway shut down to protest because of those babies shot in the crossfire of a gangwar.

D.I.E.G.O.


b7

QuoteImagine that you?re sitting down to dinner with your family, and while everyone else gets a serving of the meal, you don?t get any. So you say ?I should get my fair share.? And as a direct response to this, your dad corrects you, saying, ?everyone should get their fair share.? Now, that?s a wonderful sentiment ? indeed, everyone should, and that was kinda your point in the first place: that you should be a part of everyone, and you should get your fair share also. However, dad?s smart-ass comment just dismissed you and didn?t solve the problem that you still haven?t gotten any!

The problem is that the statement ?I should get my fair share? had an implicit ?too? at the end: ?I should get my fair share, too, just like everyone else.? But your dad?s response treated your statement as though you meant ?only I should get my fair share?, which clearly was not your intention. As a result, his statement that ?everyone should get their fair share,? while true, only served to ignore the problem you were trying to point out.

That?s the situation of the ?black lives matter? movement. Culture, laws, the arts, religion, and everyone else repeatedly suggest that all lives should matter. Clearly, that message already abounds in our society.

 
The problem is that, in practice, the world doesn?t work that way. You see the film Nightcrawler? You know the part where Renee Russo tells Jake Gyllenhal that she doesn?t want footage of a black or latino person dying, she wants news stories about affluent white people being killed? That?s not made up out of whole cloth ? there is a news bias toward stories that the majority of the audience (who are white) can identify with. So when a young black man gets killed (prior to the recent police shootings), it?s generally not considered ?news?, while a middle-aged white woman being killed is treated as news. And to a large degree, that is accurate ? young black men are killed in significantly disproportionate numbers, which is why we don?t treat it as anything new. But the result is that, societally, we don?t pay as much attention to certain people?s deaths as we do to others. So, currently, we don?t treat all lives as though they matter equally.

Just like asking dad for your fair share, the phrase ?black lives matter? also has an implicit ?too? at the end: it?s saying that black lives should also matter. But responding to this by saying ?all lives matter? is willfully going back to ignoring the problem. It?s a way of dismissing the statement by falsely suggesting that it means ?only black lives matter,? when that is obviously not the case. And so saying ?all lives matter? as a direct response to ?black lives matter? is essentially saying that we should just go back to ignoring the problem.

FlowerBomb

Quote from: RIGGY on July 12, 2016, 06:05:48 PM
QuoteImagine that you?re sitting down to dinner with your family, and while everyone else gets a serving of the meal, you don?t get any. So you say ?I should get my fair share.? And as a direct response to this, your dad corrects you, saying, ?everyone should get their fair share.? Now, that?s a wonderful sentiment ? indeed, everyone should, and that was kinda your point in the first place: that you should be a part of everyone, and you should get your fair share also. However, dad?s smart-ass comment just dismissed you and didn?t solve the problem that you still haven?t gotten any!

The problem is that the statement ?I should get my fair share? had an implicit ?too? at the end: ?I should get my fair share, too, just like everyone else.? But your dad?s response treated your statement as though you meant ?only I should get my fair share?, which clearly was not your intention. As a result, his statement that ?everyone should get their fair share,? while true, only served to ignore the problem you were trying to point out.

That?s the situation of the ?black lives matter? movement. Culture, laws, the arts, religion, and everyone else repeatedly suggest that all lives should matter. Clearly, that message already abounds in our society.

 
The problem is that, in practice, the world doesn?t work that way. You see the film Nightcrawler? You know the part where Renee Russo tells Jake Gyllenhal that she doesn?t want footage of a black or latino person dying, she wants news stories about affluent white people being killed? That?s not made up out of whole cloth ? there is a news bias toward stories that the majority of the audience (who are white) can identify with. So when a young black man gets killed (prior to the recent police shootings), it?s generally not considered ?news?, while a middle-aged white woman being killed is treated as news. And to a large degree, that is accurate ? young black men are killed in significantly disproportionate numbers, which is why we don?t treat it as anything new. But the result is that, societally, we don?t pay as much attention to certain people?s deaths as we do to others. So, currently, we don?t treat all lives as though they matter equally.

Just like asking dad for your fair share, the phrase ?black lives matter? also has an implicit ?too? at the end: it?s saying that black lives should also matter. But responding to this by saying ?all lives matter? is willfully going back to ignoring the problem. It?s a way of dismissing the statement by falsely suggesting that it means ?only black lives matter,? when that is obviously not the case. And so saying ?all lives matter? as a direct response to ?black lives matter? is essentially saying that we should just go back to ignoring the problem.
:'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

b7

Quote from: Kurama on July 12, 2016, 05:18:44 PM
Quote from: Genesis on July 12, 2016, 05:15:58 PM
two girls under the age of 10 were murdered in chicago by gang members not to long ago and not a damn peep from nobody. And guess what? The killer's still free despite the community knowing who did it.


A cop kills someone and everyone wants to protest march and be a patriot.


Are you white?

Why do you keep spouting this nonsense.

People in CHICAGO do advocate & protest and speak out against gang/gun violence.

Just because the shit isn't televised doesn't mean the work isn't being done. Turn off the damn tv and immerse yourself into these communities you speak so much of, but know little about. You folks annoying af.

Cowgirl

Quote from: Ms Malika on July 12, 2016, 06:07:24 PM
Quote from: RIGGY on July 12, 2016, 06:05:48 PM
QuoteImagine that you?re sitting down to dinner with your family, and while everyone else gets a serving of the meal, you don?t get any. So you say ?I should get my fair share.? And as a direct response to this, your dad corrects you, saying, ?everyone should get their fair share.? Now, that?s a wonderful sentiment ? indeed, everyone should, and that was kinda your point in the first place: that you should be a part of everyone, and you should get your fair share also. However, dad?s smart-ass comment just dismissed you and didn?t solve the problem that you still haven?t gotten any!

The problem is that the statement ?I should get my fair share? had an implicit ?too? at the end: ?I should get my fair share, too, just like everyone else.? But your dad?s response treated your statement as though you meant ?only I should get my fair share?, which clearly was not your intention. As a result, his statement that ?everyone should get their fair share,? while true, only served to ignore the problem you were trying to point out.

That?s the situation of the ?black lives matter? movement. Culture, laws, the arts, religion, and everyone else repeatedly suggest that all lives should matter. Clearly, that message already abounds in our society.

 
The problem is that, in practice, the world doesn?t work that way. You see the film Nightcrawler? You know the part where Renee Russo tells Jake Gyllenhal that she doesn?t want footage of a black or latino person dying, she wants news stories about affluent white people being killed? That?s not made up out of whole cloth ? there is a news bias toward stories that the majority of the audience (who are white) can identify with. So when a young black man gets killed (prior to the recent police shootings), it?s generally not considered ?news?, while a middle-aged white woman being killed is treated as news. And to a large degree, that is accurate ? young black men are killed in significantly disproportionate numbers, which is why we don?t treat it as anything new. But the result is that, societally, we don?t pay as much attention to certain people?s deaths as we do to others. So, currently, we don?t treat all lives as though they matter equally.

Just like asking dad for your fair share, the phrase ?black lives matter? also has an implicit ?too? at the end: it?s saying that black lives should also matter. But responding to this by saying ?all lives matter? is willfully going back to ignoring the problem. It?s a way of dismissing the statement by falsely suggesting that it means ?only black lives matter,? when that is obviously not the case. And so saying ?all lives matter? as a direct response to ?black lives matter? is essentially saying that we should just go back to ignoring the problem.
:'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(



Kaeli.