Quote from: ssw4919 on July 20, 2017, 05:37:41 PM
Ok then how did a witness say he taped them having sex with the 13 year-old girl? The links are obviously reporting what is in court record since they were covering the trial at the time. The witness may have been wrong but YOU said I was lying and that "no one said she was 13." I specifically said articles. Sparkle, her aunt, was interviewed in 2002 once the tape leaked and said her niece was 14 at time time. And again, who cares if she were 15? Still underage. 
You're ignoring that they found kiddie porn on him in Florida but he got off on a technicality?
And you're telling me you saw court docs about MJ's case but didn't bother reading the defensive side of the case?
n
Ok.
What witness are you talking about?
The court couldn't even determine what exact year the tape was produced but were saying it was between 1998 and 1999.
You were lying. In court, no said she was 13. At all. The general consensus was that she was either 14 or 15. Most of her family were saying she was 15.
f @ defensive side. The same can be said about Bert and well... MJ was a pedo. Deal. You can shit on Bert's perverted ass all you want but MJ is the exclusive pedo here and has never touched anything older than 18 years old. He has two major cases under his belt.
